When Controversy Turns a Profit: Kaepernick’s Endorsement with Nike
Nike announced Colin Kaepernick as one of the many faces of its 30th anniversary “Just Do It” Campaign on Sept. 5. Despite the highly controversial decision, Kaepernick’s involvement was a clever advertising tactic and overall advantageous (and profitable) decision.
In 2016, Kaepernick, a former quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, kneeled during the national anthem in order to draw mainstream attention to police brutality towards African Americans. This action launched him into a heated debate, in which some sided with Kaepernick and others deemed his kneeling unpatriotic. Nike’s decision to feature Kaepernick pulled the company into the debate, with some people praising Nike and others going so far as to burn their Nike wear in protest.
Despite the argument, Nike has profited from the publicity.
Nike’s sales spiked 27 percent shortly after the advertisement was released. However, its sales have lowered to 18 percent, now at the same level prior to the ad’s release, according to CNBC. Despite this, the attention that the ad garnered effectively improved Nike’s sales.
It is also important to recognize that in May Nike had a slew of accusations regarding sexual assault, according to the New York Times. There is also the long-standing attention on Nike’s use of sweatshops to produce its apparel. With Kaepernick’s controversial endorsement, attention has shifted from the other accusations.
No matter what side someone is on, Nike has profited from the heavy coverage. As Vox put it, “The spirit that drives one person to burn a pair of already purchased Nikes is the same spirit that might move another person to buy the branded apparel that’s part of Kaepernick’s endorsement with the company.”
Either way, Nike wins.
Your donation will support the student journalists of Portola High School. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
Maya Sabbaghian is one of two 2019-2020 Managing Editors. A staff member since 2016, Maya has previously served as a 2017-2018 Editor-in-Chief, and as...
Jane Zou is a staff writer and resident cartoonist for the Portola Pilot. As one of the few sophomores in the production, Jane is excited to contribute...
Davide | Sep 21, 2018 at 9:24 pm
Interesting for sure. But despite the generally despicable behavior of a public figure who would kneel during The National Anthem and a corporation that would tacitly encourage the same, consistency demands that we celebrate USAFA’s decision. If this had been Tebow’s brand of kneeling, we’d applaud Nike for celebrating his freedom of speech and religion. (Yes, I know it wasn’t and probably never would be, but that’s inconsistency on their part, not ours). As much as I disagree with Kaepernick and Nike on the specific content they are lauding, I celebrate their freedom to do so—as an individual and a corporation. Makes me wonder if USAFA would do the same if this were Tebow instead of Kaepernick.